Evidence lead: Bottom-seven record · Lower overturn-rate cohort
Bright Health MA: One of the ten lowest appeal overturn rates
55.0% of filed appeals were overturned, placing this record in the lowest-rate tier. Its overturn-rate rank is #37 of 37. The denominator is filed appeals, not all authorization requests. The percentage therefore describes reviewed appeals and must not be read as an individual outcome forecast.
Bottom-seven record · Lower overturn-rate cohort
One of the ten lowest appeal overturn rates
55.0% of filed appeals were overturned, placing this record in the lowest-rate tier. Its overturn-rate rank is #37 of 37. The denominator is filed appeals, not all authorization requests. The percentage therefore describes reviewed appeals and must not be read as an individual outcome forecast.
Bottom-seven record · Narrow reversal reach
Overturned appeals covered a small share of denials
8.3% of the plan's denials were ultimately overturned through the appeals counted here. The cross-contract rank is #37 of 37. This derived measure combines appeal filing and outcome, so it supplies scale context but does not identify clinical reasons, administrative errors, or coverage rules.
Ranks four through six · Higher denial-rate cohort
A top-ten denial rate in this source set
Bright Health MA's 12.3% denial rate is in the highest group of the comparison. The exact rank is #4 of 37. This is aggregate prior-authorization activity for the reporting window, not a probability that a particular service, drug, or beneficiary request will be denied.
Ranks eleven through fifteen · Upper-middle appeal uptake
Appeal filing exceeded most contract records
The 2,214 filed appeals represent 15.0% of denied requests. That is rank #11 of 37 for filing share. The ratio reports aggregate activity; it cannot reveal why an appeal was or was not filed, whether the underlying cases were comparable, or what happened outside the reporting window.
Ranks sixteen through twenty · Upper-middle request cohort
A substantial authorization workload
With 120,000 requests, this contract sits below the largest systems but above most smaller records. Its request-volume rank is #19 of 37. Volume shows the denominator behind approvals and denials; it is not a measure of plan quality, membership, benefit breadth, price, or future coverage decisions.