Evidence lead: Bottom-seven record · Smaller request-volume cohort
SummaCare MA: One of the narrower authorization records
The source records 27,000 requests here, placing the contract in the smallest-volume tier. Its request-volume rank is #37 of 37. Volume shows the denominator behind approvals and denials; it is not a measure of plan quality, membership, benefit breadth, price, or future coverage decisions.
Bottom-seven record · Smaller request-volume cohort
One of the narrower authorization records
The source records 27,000 requests here, placing the contract in the smallest-volume tier. Its request-volume rank is #37 of 37. Volume shows the denominator behind approvals and denials; it is not a measure of plan quality, membership, benefit breadth, price, or future coverage decisions.
Top-three record · High appeal-filing share
Appeals followed a large share of denials
227 appeals equal 15.0% of this contract's recorded denials. That is rank #1 of 37 for filing share. The ratio reports aggregate activity; it cannot reveal why an appeal was or was not filed, whether the underlying cases were comparable, or what happened outside the reporting window.
Ranks twenty-six through thirty · Lower-middle denial cohort
Below the center of the denial-rate ordering
At 5.6%, this contract sits in the lower-middle part of the observed distribution. The exact rank is #30 of 37. This is aggregate prior-authorization activity for the reporting window, not a probability that a particular service, drug, or beneficiary request will be denied.
Ranks seven through ten · High overturn-rate cohort
One of the ten highest appeal overturn rates
76.0% of this contract's filed appeals were overturned in the source record. Its overturn-rate rank is #8 of 37. The denominator is filed appeals, not all authorization requests. The percentage therefore describes reviewed appeals and must not be read as an individual outcome forecast.
Ranks seven through ten · Broad reversal reach
Overturned appeals covered a top-ten share of denials
172 overturned appeals equal 11.4% of every denial recorded for this contract. The cross-contract rank is #9 of 37. This derived measure combines appeal filing and outcome, so it supplies scale context but does not identify clinical reasons, administrative errors, or coverage rules.